Who Needs a CROS/BiCROS Hearing Aid? A Complete Guide

CROS Vs BiCROS diagram
Who Should Consider CROS vs BiCROS Technology?
Characteristics CROS Candidates BiCROS Candidates
Hearing Profile • Profound/complete hearing loss in one ear
• Normal or near-normal hearing in the other ear (better than 25 dB HL)
• Profound/complete hearing loss in one ear
• Mild to moderate hearing loss in the better ear (25-70 dB HL)
Common Causes • Acoustic neuroma removal
• Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
• Congenital unilateral deafness
• Trauma to one ear
• Age-related hearing loss on top of SSD
• Progressive bilateral hearing loss
• Asymmetric Ménière's disease
• Genetic conditions affecting both ears differently
Typical Complaints • "I hear fine as long as people speak to my good ear"
• "I miss sounds coming from my bad side"
• "I can't tell where sounds are coming from"
• "I struggle to hear even when using my better ear"
• "I need people to speak up even in quiet settings"
• "I miss sounds from both sides but especially my worse ear"
What The Technology Does • Transmits sound from deaf ear to normal ear
• No amplification in the receiving ear
• Creates awareness of sounds from all directions
• Transmits sound from deaf ear to better ear
• Provides amplification for the better ear
• Addresses both unilateral loss and hearing impairment
Primary Benefits • Awareness of sounds from the deaf side
• Reduced need to reposition in conversations
• Improved safety with environmental awareness
• Addresses hearing loss in both ears simultaneously
• Improves overall hearing clarity and volume
• Provides comprehensive hearing solution
Functional Test If covering your normal ear prevents you from hearing effectively, you may be a CROS candidate. If you struggle hearing even with your better ear uncovered, you may be a BiCROS candidate.

Introduction

Managing hearing loss presents unique challenges, particularly when it affects one ear more significantly than the other. For individuals with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing profiles, standard hearing aids often fall short of addressing their specific needs. This is where specialised solutions like CROS and BiCROS hearing systems become invaluable.

This comprehensive guide explores who can benefit most from these innovative hearing solutions, what conditions they address, and how to determine if they might be right for you or a loved one.

Understanding Asymmetric Hearing Profiles

Before determining who needs a CROS or BiCROS system, it's important to understand the specific hearing profiles these devices are designed to address:

Single-Sided Deafness (SSD)

Single-sided deafness describes a condition where an individual has:

  • Normal or near-normal hearing in one ear (thresholds better than 25 dB HL)

  • Severe to profound hearing loss in the other ear (thresholds worse than 70 dB HL)

This condition affects approximately 1 in 1,000 adults in the UK, with roughly 9,000 new cases occurring annually. SSD can result from a variety of causes, including sudden sensorineural hearing loss, acoustic neuroma removal, or congenital factors.

Asymmetric Hearing Loss

Asymmetric hearing loss describes a condition where:

  • One ear has significantly poorer hearing than the other

  • The better ear may also have some degree of hearing impairment

  • The difference between ears creates unique listening challenges

This profile is relatively common, with an estimated 15-20% of people with hearing loss experiencing significant asymmetry between their ears.

Candidates for CROS Hearing Systems

CROS hearing systems are specifically designed for individuals who meet particular hearing criteria and experience specific listening challenges.

Audiological Profile for CROS Candidates

You may be a candidate for a CROS hearing system if you have:

  • Complete or profound hearing loss in one ear (typically worse than 80-90 dB HL)

  • Normal or near-normal hearing in the other ear (typically better than 25 dB HL)

  • A non-aidable ear, where traditional amplification provides no meaningful benefit

  • Permanent hearing loss that cannot be addressed through medical or surgical intervention

This hearing configuration creates a "dead ear" situation where one side of the head essentially receives no useful auditory information.

Functional Challenges Indicating CROS Need

Beyond the audiometric criteria, functional listening challenges often indicate a need for CROS technology. You might benefit from a CROS system if you regularly experience:

  • Difficulty localising sounds in your environment (determining where sounds originate)

  • Missing conversations that occur on your impaired side

  • Struggling in restaurants, meetings, or social gatherings to follow discussions

  • Feeling unsafe due to reduced awareness of environmental sounds from your deaf side

  • Constantly repositioning yourself to place your good ear toward the sound source

  • Avoiding certain social situations due to communication difficulties

  • Experiencing fatigue from the increased concentration required to hear

  • Frustration from missed information when someone speaks from your impaired side

Medical Conditions Often Leading to CROS Candidacy

Several medical conditions frequently result in the hearing profile that makes someone a candidate for CROS technology:

  • Acoustic neuroma removal (surgical removal of a benign tumour on the hearing nerve)

  • Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) that did not recover with treatment

  • Vestibular schwannoma or other tumours affecting the auditory pathway

  • Ménière's disease (in advanced cases where one ear has lost functional hearing)

  • Temporal bone fractures or severe head trauma affecting one ear

  • Congenital unilateral hearing loss (born with deafness in one ear)

  • Viral infections (mumps, measles, or other viral causes of unilateral hearing loss)

  • Autoimmune inner ear disease (when affecting one ear significantly more than the other)

Candidates for BiCROS Hearing Systems

BiCROS systems address a more complex hearing profile where both ears have impairment, but to significantly different degrees.

Audiological Profile for BiCROS Candidates

You may be a candidate for a BiCROS hearing system if you have:

  • Profound or complete hearing loss in one ear (typically poorer than 80-90 dB HL)

  • Mild to moderate hearing loss in the better ear (typically between 25-70 dB HL)

  • An unaidable poorer ear that cannot benefit from conventional amplification

  • An aidable better ear that can benefit from amplification

  • A significant asymmetry between your two ears (typically greater than 40 dB difference)

This profile creates a situation where the better ear needs direct amplification while also needing to receive sound information from the poorer side.

Functional Challenges Indicating BiCROS Need

Individuals who would benefit from BiCROS technology typically experience:

  • Difficulty hearing even when sounds are directed toward the better ear

  • Problems understanding speech even in relatively quiet environments

  • Extreme difficulty in background noise even when positioned strategically

  • Increased listening effort leading to fatigue even in one-on-one conversations

  • Inability to use a telephone effectively even with the better ear

  • Spatial distortion in how sounds are perceived

  • Frustration with standard hearing aids that don't address the single-sided component

  • Safety concerns due to limited awareness of environmental sounds

Medical Conditions Often Leading to BiCROS Candidacy

BiCROS candidates often develop their hearing profile through:

  • Age-related hearing loss (presbycusis) occurring on top of pre-existing single-sided deafness

  • Progressive sensorineural hearing loss affecting both ears at different rates

  • Bilateral Ménière's disease with asymmetric progression

  • Genetic hearing loss with asymmetric expression

  • Noise-induced hearing loss affecting one ear more severely than the already-compromised ear

  • Ototoxic medication effects causing further decline in a partially-hearing ear

  • Auto-immune inner ear disease with bilateral but asymmetric impact

Special Populations Who Benefit from CROS/BiCROS Technology

Certain populations face unique challenges that make CROS or BiCROS technology particularly beneficial:

Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss

Children with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss face significant educational and developmental challenges:

  • Research shows they are 10 times more likely to fail a school year compared to normal-hearing peers

  • They experience greater difficulty developing speech and language skills

  • They often struggle with attention in classroom environments

  • They may develop behavioural issues related to communication frustration

CROS/BiCROS technology can be fitted to children as young as 5-6 years old, providing crucial support during key developmental years.

Working Professionals

Professionals in demanding listening environments often find CROS/BiCROS technology essential for workplace success:

  • Teachers who need to hear students from all directions in a classroom

  • Business professionals participating in meetings with multiple speakers

  • Customer service representatives who interact with the public in noisy environments

  • Healthcare workers who must catch critical information in fast-paced settings

  • Legal professionals who cannot miss details in courtroom or consultation settings

Active Seniors

Older adults with single-sided or asymmetric hearing loss face particular challenges:

  • Increased risk of social isolation and associated cognitive decline

  • Safety concerns related to diminished awareness of environmental sounds

  • Balance issues that can be exacerbated by asymmetric hearing

  • Interaction difficulties in group settings common in retirement communities

CROS/BiCROS technology can help maintain social connections and quality of life for this population.

When CROS/BiCROS May Not Be Appropriate

Despite their benefits, CROS and BiCROS systems are not the right solution for everyone with asymmetric hearing. These systems may not be appropriate for:

  • Individuals with significant cognitive impairment who may struggle with the concept of sound redirection

  • Those with severe manual dexterity issues who cannot manage two devices

  • People with profound tinnitus in their better ear that might be exacerbated by added stimulation

  • Individuals whose primary concern is sound localisation, as this remains a limitation even with CROS technology

  • Those whose hearing loss in the better ear exceeds the fitting range of available BiCROS receivers

  • People who cannot adjust to the sensation of hearing sounds from their deaf side in their better ear

Alternative Solutions to Consider

If CROS/BiCROS technology isn't suitable, several alternatives might be considered:

  • Bone conduction devices: Transmit sound through the skull bone to the functioning cochlea

  • Cochlear implants: Now increasingly used for single-sided deafness in appropriate candidates

  • Contralateral microphone systems: External microphones that transmit to the better ear

  • Remote microphone technologies: For specific challenging listening situations

  • Communication strategies: Practical approaches to positioning and environment management

The Assessment Process

Determining candidacy for CROS or BiCROS technology involves a comprehensive assessment process:

Audiological Evaluation

A thorough hearing assessment should include:

  • Pure-tone audiometry to establish precise hearing thresholds in both ears

  • Speech recognition testing in quiet and noise

  • Word recognition scores to determine speech understanding

  • Functional gain measurements if applicable

  • Assessment of dynamic range in the better ear

Lifestyle Assessment

Understanding real-world needs through:

  • Detailed case history and lifestyle questionnaire

  • Communication demands assessment

  • Occupational requirements evaluation

  • Social and recreational activity review

Trial Period Importance

Most hearing care professionals recommend a trial period with CROS/BiCROS technology because:

  • The experience of hearing from the dead side takes adaptation

  • Real-world performance may differ from expectations

  • Individual benefit varies significantly between users

  • Different models and settings can be evaluated

Typically, a 30-60 day trial provides sufficient experience to determine if the technology meets the individual's needs.

Measuring Success with CROS/BiCROS Systems

How do we know if a CROS or BiCROS system is working effectively? Success can be measured through:

Objective Measures

  • Improved speech recognition scores when speech is presented from the impaired side

  • Reduced head shadow effect as measured through directional testing

  • Lower speech reception thresholds in specific spatial configurations

Subjective Measures

  • Self-reported improvement in daily communication situations

  • Reduced listening effort and fatigue

  • Increased social participation

  • Greater confidence in communication

  • Improved quality of life scores on validated assessment tools

Conclusion: Is a CROS/BiCROS System Right for You?

CROS and BiCROS hearing systems provide specialised solutions for specific hearing profiles. You might be a candidate for these technologies if you:

  • Have profound hearing loss in one ear with better hearing in the other

  • Struggle to hear people speaking from your deaf side

  • Find yourself constantly repositioning to hear better

  • Experience listening fatigue from the effort of compensating for your hearing loss

  • Feel excluded in group conversations or noisy environments

  • Have safety concerns due to reduced awareness of sounds

The best way to determine if CROS/BiCROS technology is right for you is to consult with an audiologist who specialises in these systems. They can conduct a comprehensive assessment, explain your options, and often arrange a trial period to experience the technology in your daily life.

Remember that adapting to CROS/BiCROS technology takes time as your brain adjusts to the new way of processing sound information. Most users report a period of adjustment followed by significant improvement in their communication ability and quality of life.

Frequently Asked Questions About CROS/BiCROS Candidacy

How do I know if I need a CROS or a BiCROS hearing aid?
The primary factor determining whether you need a CROS or BiCROS system is the hearing status of your better ear:

You likely need a CROS system if:
• You have profound hearing loss or deafness in one ear
• Your other ear has normal or near-normal hearing (thresholds better than 25 dB HL)
• You hear well when sounds are directed toward your good ear
• You don't need amplification in your good ear

You likely need a BiCROS system if:
• You have profound hearing loss or deafness in one ear
• Your better ear also has mild to moderate hearing loss
• You struggle to hear clearly even when sounds are directed toward your better ear
• You would benefit from amplification in your better ear

A simple test: If covering your better ear leaves you unable to hear effectively, but uncovering it allows you to hear clearly, you're likely a CROS candidate. If you struggle even with your better ear uncovered, you're more likely a BiCROS candidate. A proper audiological assessment is essential for determining which technology would benefit you most.
Can children use CROS or BiCROS hearing aids?
Yes, children with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss can benefit significantly from CROS or BiCROS technology. In fact, addressing unilateral hearing loss in children is particularly important because:

• Research shows children with untreated unilateral hearing loss are 10 times more likely to fail a school year
• Classroom environments present particularly challenging listening situations
• Auditory development and language acquisition can be affected by limited sound input
• Social development may be impacted by communication difficulties

Most audiologists recommend CROS/BiCROS technology for children from about 5-6 years of age, when they're mature enough to manage the system and provide feedback. For younger children, FM systems or bone conduction solutions might be considered first.

Special considerations for paediatric CROS/BiCROS fittings include:
• Tamper-resistant battery compartments
• Durable designs that can withstand active play
• Colourful options that children may find more appealing
• Regular follow-up to ensure proper fit as the child grows
• Coordination with educational audiologists and teachers

Importantly, children often adapt more quickly to CROS/BiCROS technology than adults due to greater neuroplasticity.
Will a CROS/BiCROS system help me localise sounds better?
CROS and BiCROS systems improve awareness of sounds from all directions, but they don't fully restore true sound localisation ability. Here's what you can realistically expect:

What these systems do provide:
• Awareness that a sound is occurring on your deaf side
• The ability to hear speech from your impaired side without turning your head
• Improved general awareness of your total sound environment
• Better detection of sound presence from different directions

What these systems don't provide:
• True binaural hearing (which requires two functioning ears)
• Precise sound localisation abilities
• The ability to accurately judge distance of sound sources
• Restoration of natural directional hearing

This limitation exists because accurate sound localisation relies on subtle timing and intensity differences between two functioning ears. Since CROS/BiCROS systems deliver all sounds to just one ear, the brain cannot use these binaural cues.

Many users develop compensatory strategies over time, such as small head movements to help determine sound direction. While not perfect, most users find the improved awareness of sounds from all directions significantly enhances their safety and communication abilities despite the localisation limitations.
Should I consider a cochlear implant instead of a CROS/BiCROS system?
Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness (SSD) is a relatively recent development that may be worth considering as an alternative to CROS/BiCROS technology in certain cases.

Potential advantages of cochlear implants for SSD:
• May provide true binaural hearing capabilities
• Can improve sound localisation abilities
• Often provides better speech understanding in noise
• May effectively reduce or eliminate tinnitus in the deaf ear
• Creates true bilateral hearing rather than routing sound to one side

Considerations that may favour CROS/BiCROS:
• Non-surgical approach
• Significantly lower cost
• No permanent modification to the body
• Shorter adjustment period for most users
• Can be tried with minimal commitment

Cochlear implantation may be more appropriate if:
• You have relatively recent onset of profound unilateral hearing loss
• You experience severe tinnitus in your deaf ear
• Sound localisation is particularly important for your lifestyle or occupation
• You've tried CROS/BiCROS technology with limited satisfaction
• You meet medical and audiological criteria for implantation

In the UK, NHS funding for cochlear implants for single-sided deafness varies by region. Many patients try CROS/BiCROS technology first, and if benefits are limited, may then consider cochlear implantation. This decision should involve detailed discussion with both an audiologist and a specialised ENT consultant.
How long does it take to adjust to a CROS/BiCROS system?
Adapting to a CROS or BiCROS system is a unique experience that varies from person to person, but most users go through a distinct adjustment process:

Initial period (first 1-2 weeks):
• The sensation of hearing sounds from your deaf side may feel strange or disorienting
• You might be acutely aware of environmental noises you previously missed
• Some users report a slight echo-like perception as they adapt
• The brain is beginning to relearn how to process spatial sound information

Adjustment phase (2-4 weeks):
• Gradually increasing comfort with the new sound awareness
• Developing strategies for using the additional sound information
• Noticing improvements in specific listening situations
• Fine-tuning appointments may be needed to optimise settings

Long-term adaptation (1-3 months):
• The experience becomes more natural and integrated
• Users typically report significant improvement in communication ease
• Many develop a preference for using the system full-time
• Most are able to function more confidently in challenging environments

Factors that influence adaptation time include:
• Duration of hearing loss before fitting
• Consistency of use (those who wear the system consistently adapt faster)
• Complexity of typical listening environments
• Individual neuroplasticity and cognitive factors
• Quality of audiological support and counselling

Most audiologists recommend a gradual acclimatisation schedule, starting in quieter, controlled environments and progressively introducing more challenging listening situations as comfort increases.

References

  1. Arndt, S., Aschendorff, A., Laszig, R., Beck, R., Schild, C., Kroeger, S., ... & Wesarg, T. (2011). Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otology & Neurotology, 32(1), 39-47.
  2. Baguley, D. M., Bird, J., Humphriss, R. L., & Prevost, A. T. (2006). The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults. Clinical Otolaryngology, 31(1), 6-14.
  3. Finbow, J., Bance, M., Aiken, S., Gulliver, M., Verge, J., & Caissie, R. (2015). A comparison between wireless CROS and bone-anchored hearing devices for single-sided deafness: A pilot study. Otology & Neurotology, 36(5), 819-825.
  4. Galvin, K. L., Hughes, K. C., & Mok, M. (2010). Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a bimodal hearing device? International Journal of Audiology, 49(5), 368-377.
  5. Bess, F. H., Dodd-Murphy, J., & Parker, R. A. (1998). Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear and Hearing, 19(5), 339-354.
  6. Hill, S. L., Marcus, A., Digges, E. N. B., Silverstein, H., & Roland, J. T. (2006). Assessment of patient satisfaction with various configurations of digital CROS and BiCROS hearing aids. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 85(7), 427-442.
  7. Lieu, J. E. (2004). Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130(5), 524-530.
  8. McLeod, B., Upfold, L., & Taylor, A. (2008). Self reported hearing difficulties following excision of vestibular schwannoma. International Journal of Audiology, 47(7), 420-430.
  9. Valente, M., Oeding, K., Brockmeyer, A., Smith, S., & Kallogjeri, D. (2018). Differences in word recognition and localization performance with digital wireless CROS, BICROS, and monaural hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 29(8), 696-710.
  10. Wazen, J. J., Spitzer, J. B., Ghossaini, S. N., Fayad, J. N., Niparko, J. K., Cox, K., ... & Soli, S. D. (2003). Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 129(3), 248-254.
  11. Williams, V. A., McArdle, R. A., & Chisolm, T. H. (2012). Subjective and objective outcomes from new BiCROS technology in a veteran sample. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(10), 789-806.
  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2018). Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. Technology appraisal guidance [TA566].
  13. Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2004). Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), 100-114.
  14. Snapp, H. A., Fabry, D. A., Telischi, F. F., Arheart, K. L., & Angeli, S. I. (2010). A clinical evaluation of wireless CROS/BiCROS system. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(3), 175-186.
  15. Zeitler, D. M., Dorman, M. F., Bramlette, A. J., & Svirsky, M. A. (2015). Bimodal hearing: Device fitting and outcomes. American Journal of Audiology, 24(4), pp. 482-491.