What is a CROS Hearing Aid? A Comprehensive Guide
Introduction
For individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) or unaidable hearing in one ear, the world of sound presents unique challenges. Traditional hearing aids, designed to amplify sound for those with hearing loss in both ears, often cannot address the specific needs of those who have one ear with minimal or no functional hearing. This is where Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) hearing aids come into play—an innovative technology specifically designed to bridge the hearing gap for those with asymmetric hearing profiles.
What Exactly is a CROS Hearing Aid?
A CROS hearing aid is a specialized hearing device created specifically for people with single-sided deafness or unaidable hearing in one ear. Unlike conventional hearing aids that amplify sounds, CROS systems work on an entirely different principle: they capture sounds from the side with profound hearing loss and wirelessly transmit them to the functioning ear.
The term "CROS" stands for "Contralateral Routing of Signal," which effectively describes its function—routing sound signals from one side of the head to the opposite (contralateral) ear.
The Core Components of a CROS System
A complete CROS hearing aid system consists of two primary components that work together seamlessly:
1. The Transmitter Unit
The transmitter is worn on the impaired ear—the ear with profound or unaidable hearing loss. This component:
Contains microphones that pick up sounds, speech, and environmental noises from the "deaf" side
Processes these sound signals digitally
Wirelessly transmits the processed signals to the receiver unit
Is designed to look similar to a standard behind-the-ear hearing aid
The transmitter doesn't attempt to amplify sound for the non-functional ear. Instead, it serves as a sophisticated "ear" that captures sound and sends it elsewhere.
2. The Receiver Unit
The receiver is worn on the functioning ear with normal or aidable hearing. This component:
Receives the wireless signals from the transmitter
Delivers these sounds into the functioning ear
Allows the better ear to perceive sounds from both sides simultaneously
Can be either a simple receiver or, in some cases, include amplification features
This two-part system effectively overcomes the physical barrier of the head, which normally blocks sounds from traveling from one side to the other—known as the "head shadow effect."
Modern CROS Design Evolution
Today's CROS hearing aids have evolved significantly from their early iterations:
Wireless Technology
Modern CROS systems utilize advanced wireless technology for signal transmission:
Early CROS aids used wired connections or relatively primitive wireless technology
Contemporary models employ sophisticated digital wireless transmission
Many systems now use Bluetooth or proprietary 2.4 GHz transmission for clear, instantaneous sound delivery
Form Factors
CROS hearing aids come in various styles to meet different needs and preferences:
Behind-the-Ear (BTE): The most common style, with components that sit behind each ear
In-the-Ear (ITE): More discreet options with components that fit within the ear canal and concha
Receiver-in-Canal (RIC): Combines behind-the-ear units with thin wires leading to receivers in the ear canal
Custom-molded options: Tailored precisely to the user's ear anatomy for optimal comfort
Most major hearing aid manufacturers offer CROS solutions, including Phonak, Signia, Widex, ReSound, Oticon, and Starkey, each with their own proprietary features and design approaches.
Historical Context: The Evolution of CROS Technology
The concept of CROS hearing aids dates back to the 1960s when audiologist Dr. Harford developed the first CROS system to address the needs of patients with unilateral hearing loss. These early systems were bulky and relied on wired connections running behind the neck to transmit sound from one side to the other.
The technology has undergone remarkable transformation since:
1960s-1970s: First wired CROS systems introduced
1980s-1990s: Improved analog systems with better aesthetics
Early 2000s: Introduction of digital CROS technology
2010s: Emergence of wireless digital systems with significantly improved sound quality
Present day: Sophisticated, discreet systems with advanced digital sound processing capabilities
This evolution represents decades of innovation dedicated to solving the unique challenges of single-sided deafness.
How CROS Hearing Aids Differ From Traditional Devices
It's important to understand that CROS systems are fundamentally different from conventional hearing aids in several key ways:
Purpose and Function
Traditional hearing aids: Amplify sounds to make them audible for ears with residual hearing
CROS hearing aids: Reroute sounds from the deaf side to the functional ear without necessarily amplifying
Intended Users
Traditional hearing aids: Designed for individuals with mild to profound hearing loss who have usable hearing in the aided ear
CROS hearing aids: Specifically created for those with unaidable hearing in one ear and normal or correctable hearing in the other
Auditory Experience
Traditional hearing aids: Attempt to restore hearing in the ear where the device is worn
CROS hearing aids: Create awareness of sounds from the impaired side by presenting them to the better ear
These differences make CROS hearing aids a specialized solution for a specific hearing profile rather than a general hearing enhancement device.
The CROS Fitting Process
Obtaining a CROS hearing aid involves a specialized fitting process:
Comprehensive hearing evaluation: To confirm single-sided deafness or unaidable hearing in one ear
Candidacy assessment: Determining if CROS technology is appropriate for the individual's specific situation
Selection of appropriate CROS system: Based on lifestyle needs, cosmetic preferences, and hearing profile
Custom fitting: Ensuring proper physical fit and comfort of both devices
Fine-tuning: Adjusting settings for optimal sound balance and quality
Orientation and training: Learning how to use, maintain, and get maximum benefit from the system
This process is typically conducted by audiologists specifically trained in CROS technology and single-sided deafness management.
Real-Life Application: When CROS Makes a Difference
To better understand CROS technology, consider these everyday scenarios where it can make a substantial difference:
Scenario 1: Conversation in a Car
Without CROS: A passenger speaking from the side of the impaired ear would be difficult or impossible to hear, especially with road noise.
With CROS: The system picks up the passenger's voice and delivers it to the good ear, allowing for comfortable conversation regardless of seating position.
Scenario 2: Walking with a Companion
Without CROS: If the companion walks on the side of the impaired ear, the person with SSD must constantly turn their head to hear.
With CROS: Conversation flows naturally regardless of which side the companion is on, reducing strain and improving social interaction.
Scenario 3: Group Meetings
Without CROS: Missing comments from speakers on the impaired side can lead to confusion and participation difficulties.
With CROS: Awareness of speech from all directions helps maintain engagement in the conversation without having to strategically position oneself.
These scenarios illustrate the practical, everyday benefits that CROS technology can provide by addressing the specific challenges of single-sided hearing.
CROS Technology: Beyond the Basics
Modern CROS systems incorporate sophisticated features that enhance the user experience:
Directional Microphones
Many current CROS transmitters include directional microphone technology that can focus on sounds coming from specific directions, particularly useful in noisy environments where selective hearing is beneficial.
Environmental Classification
Advanced CROS systems can automatically identify different sound environments (conversation, music, outdoor settings, etc.) and adjust settings accordingly to optimize the hearing experience for each situation.
Wind Noise Reduction
Special microphone configurations and digital processing help minimize the impact of wind noise, which can be particularly problematic for hearing aid microphones.
Tinnitus Management Features
Some CROS systems incorporate tinnitus management sounds or programs, addressing the fact that many people with single-sided deafness also experience tinnitus in the affected ear.
Smartphone Connectivity
Many modern CROS hearing aids connect to smartphones via dedicated apps, allowing users to adjust settings discreetly, stream audio directly to their devices, and even use their phone as a remote microphone for challenging listening situations.
Conclusion
CROS hearing aids represent a specialized solution for those with single-sided deafness—a condition that presents unique hearing challenges requiring specific technological approaches. By rerouting sound from the impaired side to the functioning ear, these innovative devices restore awareness of the complete sound environment, improving safety, communication, and quality of life.
Understanding what CROS technology is—and isn't—forms the foundation for exploring whether this approach might be right for individuals experiencing profound unilateral hearing loss. As with all hearing technologies, consultation with a qualified audiologist is essential to determine the most appropriate solution for each person's unique hearing profile and lifestyle needs.
Frequently Asked Questions About CROS Hearing Aids
What does CROS stand for and what does it mean?
Are CROS hearing aids the same as traditional hearing aids?
CROS hearing aids, by contrast, don't attempt to improve hearing in the deaf or profoundly hearing-impaired ear. Instead, they capture sounds from that side and wirelessly transmit them to the functioning ear. The CROS system essentially allows your good ear to hear sounds from both sides of your head, compensating for the non-functional ear rather than trying to restore its hearing.
While they may look similar to traditional hearing aids, their internal technology and function are quite different, and they're specifically designed for the unique challenges of single-sided deafness.
Do I need to wear devices on both ears with a CROS system?
• A transmitter device on your deaf or profoundly hearing-impaired ear
• A receiver device on your ear with normal or aidable hearing
Both components are necessary for the system to work effectively. The transmitter captures sounds from the side with hearing loss and wirelessly sends them to the receiver, which delivers them to your functioning ear. Without both devices, the sound routing that defines CROS technology cannot occur.
Modern CROS devices are designed to be comfortable, discreet, and aesthetically similar, so they appear as a matched pair despite performing different functions. Most people quickly adapt to wearing devices on both ears, especially as they experience the significant benefit of awareness of sounds from their previously "deaf" side.
Can a CROS hearing aid restore normal hearing in my deaf ear?
What CROS technology does provide is awareness of sounds that would otherwise be missed because they occur on your deaf side. While you'll still be hearing everything through your functioning ear, you'll gain improved environmental awareness and better ability to hear speech from all directions.
It's important to have realistic expectations: CROS systems significantly improve awareness of sounds from the impaired side, but they don't restore true binaural hearing (hearing with two functioning ears). Functions that require two working ears—like precise sound localization and certain aspects of spatial hearing—will still be limited compared to normal binaural hearing.
How have CROS hearing aids evolved over time?
1960s-1970s: The first CROS systems used wired connections, with a physical wire running behind the neck to connect the microphone on the impaired side to the receiver on the functioning side. These were functional but cosmetically obvious and prone to damage.
1980s-1990s: Improvements in analog technology led to better sound quality and slightly more discreet designs, though still with physical connections between the units.
Early 2000s: The introduction of digital signal processing allowed for better sound quality and the beginning of wireless transmission, eliminating the need for connecting wires.
2010s: Significant advancements in wireless technology and miniaturization led to much smaller, more discreet devices with improved sound quality and battery life. These systems began incorporating sophisticated digital features like directional microphones and noise reduction.
Present day: Modern CROS systems feature advanced digital wireless transmission using Bluetooth or proprietary 2.4 GHz technology, smartphone connectivity, rechargeable batteries, and sophisticated sound processing algorithms that can adapt to different listening environments. They're smaller, more comfortable, more reliable, and offer significantly better sound quality than their predecessors.
This evolution represents a continuous improvement in addressing the unique needs of people with single-sided deafness, with each generation offering better performance and user experience.
References
- Pumford, J. (2005). Benefits of CROS amplification for individuals with unilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology, 44(8), 414-420.
- Kuk, F., Seper, E., Lau, C., Crose, B., & Korhonen, P. (2015). Effects of Training on the Use of a Manual Microphone Switch on a CROS Device. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(5), 478-493.
- Harford, E., & Barry, J. (1965). A rehabilitative approach to the problem of unilateral hearing impairment: The contralateral routing of signals (CROS). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 30, 121-138.
- Snapp, H. A., Hoffer, M. E., Liu, X., & Rajguru, S. M. (2017). Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users. Otology & Neurotology, 38(10), 1397-1404.
- Hol, M. K., Kunst, S. J., Snik, A. F., Bosman, A. J., Mylanus, E. A., & Cremers, C. W. (2010). Bone-anchored hearing aids in patients with acquired and congenital unilateral inner ear deafness (Baha CROS). Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 119(7), 447-454.
- Hayes, D., & Chen, J. (2012). Bone-conduction amplification with completely-in-the-canal hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9(1), 59-66.
- Mueller, H. G., & Giron, L. (2010). Advances in digital hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing, 31(4), 326-346.
- Del Dot, J., Hickson, L. M., & O'Connell, B. (1992). Speech perception in noise with BICROS hearing aids. Scandinavian Audiology, 21(4), 261-264.
- Bridges, J. A., & Bentler, R. A. (1998). Relating hearing aid use to well-being among older adults. The Hearing Journal, 51(7), 39-42.
- Kochkin, S. (2010). MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. The Hearing Journal, 63(1), 19-32.
- Wolfe, J., Morais, M., & Schafer, E. (2015). Improving hearing performance for cochlear implant recipients with use of a digital, wireless, remote-microphone, audio-streaming accessory. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(6), 532-539.
- Picou, E. M., & Ricketts, T. A. (2013). Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(1), 59-70.
- Dillon, H. (2012). Hearing Aids (2nd ed.). Thieme Medical Publishers.
- McSpaden, J. B., & McSpaden, C. H. (2007). A method for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of CROS/Bi-CROS hearing aid fittings. The Hearing Journal, 60(7), 34-42.
- Taylor, B., & Mueller, H. G. (2016). Fitting and Dispensing Hearing Aids (2nd ed.). Plural Publishing.
- Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2004). Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), 100-114.
- Williams, V. A., McArdle, R. A., & Chisolm, T. H. (2012). Subjective and objective outcomes from new BiCROS technology in a veteran sample. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(10), 789-806.